We only ship to addresses in the USA. Live somewhere else? Please order from one of our international distributors. Click Here
BK Magazine Articles & Musings
Posted by Shabnam Banerjee-McFarland, Sales and Marketing Strategist, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. .
Shabnam is the Sales & Marketing Strategist at BK and coordinates launch campaigns for a few books per season. She is a San Francisco native born & raised, forever wandering the earth like a unicorn.
More often than not, social sector startups fail to gain traction on enabling the change that they wish to accomplish. Why is this an industry norm?
This past Wednesday, we were joined by author Michel Gelobter, who opened the discussion for exploring alternative avenues for streamlining the nonprofit sector in order to resemble that of tech startups. Gelobter pointed out that the majority of the nonprofit sector operates under archaic structures – a structure that wastes more money and time without adequately responding to the data to support the desired change.
The need for efficiency in the social sector is urgent and vital to sustaining change that creates a big impact, in whichever issue the organization wishes to confront. A great deal of money, energy and time is lost with the current method of testing and gauging impact. Gelobter has worked with a wide variety of social change nonprofits, specifically focusing on environmental justice and sustainability.
He’s also worked with a number of tech-startups, and discovered that extracting the culture of being financially and organizationally lean, as done in business startups, would greatly benefit the social sector.
For Gelobter, Lean Change centers on 4 main principles;
Transposing the structure of tech startups into the social change sector poses many difficult paradoxes, but moreover, it creates opportunities for nonprofits to flourish and actually be and see the change they seek.
CommonLit, an organization that I will be working with this summer, has witnessed its success by operating under the Lean Change model. They’ve conducted studies in underserved communities, responding quickly in order to increase growth in literacy rates in K-12 students. This nonprofit start-up is a prime example of identifying the need for change (the large percentage of illiteracy) by asking their customers (K-12 students and teachers) what kind of material they actually want to read and discuss. They then work from this point to upload as much free content as possible based on the responses from their customers.
Since conducting this study in these communities in Boston, they’ve secured grant-funding opportunities to continue to provide free texts for students, founded on the principle that these are the materials that their customers specified as necessary to solving the illiteracy problem. Not only that, they’ve entered the terrain of a fully functioning nonprofit, and exiting unstable start-up territory.
The major reason for using this structure of testing hypotheses quickly and efficiently, gauging the impact, and listening to the feedback of the customers (the targeted contingency) is that the nonprofit sector is; a.) Already incredibly “lean” and b.) The beneficiaries are not the people investing in the project, but rather the customers. Combining a lean productivity mentality to the social sector ensures that the work being done will have more opportunities for results and achieving justice.
Sorry no comments yet. You could be the first! Log in or Join the BK Community to add your comment.