Amazon Reviews
27 of 29 people found the following review to be helpful:
Coherent and Simple, Not the Whole Story, December 27, 2006
By Robert D. Steele
I concur with all the 5 star reviews with respect to this book presenting a vision for the next level of capitalism nurturing the commons rather than destroying it, but it is not the whole story. It is simple without being simplistic, but the terms "ecological economics" (see my reviews of books by Herman Daly) and "natural capitalism (see my reviews of books by Paul Hawken) are not an integral part of this story. Neither is public philosophy, although the author clearly has an ethical public policy of his own.
Like the work of Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, Hunter Lovins, and Herman Daly, it does not accuse nor seek repatriation of benefits as much as it seeks to educate and demonstrate why respect for the commons is good for business.
I recommend Michael Sandel's "Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics," and Paul Hawken's "The Ecology of Commerce," in addition to this book, but those deeply interested in this topic might wish to expand their range by browsing some of my lists on democracy, capitalism, and security.
The book ends with numerous ideas, some easy to implement, like time banks (I see a rush to displace banks, money, credit, and interest coming down the pike), and some more difficult but essential, such as reversing the spectrum licenses and land licenses awarded to corporations under Capitalism 1.0, and putting those resources to work for all of the people.
The author spends some time noting that government is not the complete answer, and I not only agree, I am eagerly waiting for a book called Government 3.0 or Democracy 3.0, something that brings together the diverse literature on the need to localize agriculture and energy again, stop the global corporations, e.g. Wal-Mart, from destroying communities, and restore integrity and trust in human transactions. In a sense, this book is a model that could be applied to other areas in need of revitalization.
Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics
The Ecology of Commerce
Ecological Economics: Principles And Applications
Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution
Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming
Wal-mart: The High Cost of Low Price
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price
14 of 14 people found the following review to be helpful:
A Brilliant Overview of the Commons and Economics, November 7, 2006
By David A. Bollier
Peter Barnes does a masterful job in re-imagining economics to take account of the commons, the shared resources that we inherit together and must pass along undiminished to our children. This book is lucid and highly readable as it deconstructs key flaws in conventional economics and proposes innovative solutions that protect the commons. Barnes is a former businessman (cofounder of Working Assets) and journalist, so he approaches the subject with sophistication and clarity.
Barnes notes, for example, that conventional economics typically fails to account for the hidden subsidies that companies take from the commons (air, water, spectrum, public lands, federal R&D, etc.). Companies also use the commons as a convenient place to "externalize" their wastes, social disruptions and other costs. Barnes suggests some new legal and institutionl strategies -- such as stakeholder trusts -- as ways to harness market forces while preserving our "common wealth." This book is succinct, profound, idealistic and practical.
12 of 13 people found the following review to be helpful:
The Beginnings of a Conceptual Framework for a New Economic System, February 23, 2007
By Emer O'Siochru
I have just read Capitalism 3.0 by Peter Barnes and am very impressed. Peter is a Georgist of the US variety although that fact is not immediately apparent as the book is written in a very light, non-ideological, non academic style. It is an extremely accessible and well written case for 'the propertisation' of the commons - emphatically NOT 'privatisation'. It does not discuss land value taxes/rents directly but places them indirectly within the context of all commons and proposes a solution to 'the tragedy' of all commons that, followed through, would nevertheless deliver LVT and something like a citizens income.
Peter sees a need for a counterbalance to corporate power linked to private property, but not by State ownership and hence not by any measure that smacks of Socialism. Instead he puts forward the idea of many kinds of Trusts holding many kinds of commons property- from the GHG emisison rights to scientific knowledge to community land. Apart from the very essential job of supporting Commons Trusts and assigning property rights and legal protections to them, governments would thereafter stand aside. Governments would especially distance themselves from disbursing the receipts/rents/ licence fees collected for the use of the various commons as their susceptibility to corporate influence, according to Peter Barnes, is systemic and cannot be overcome. It is a very American approach - rather than intervening directly to regulate the power of an damaging but essential force, a countervailing force is introduced to dynamically re balance the system. A global Trust would be required to protect the atmosphere but this would not be given political power per se - but it would have significant economic power to balance the existing private sector influence of the WTO.
This solution would satisfy libertarian, free market thinkers as it would not enhance the role of the State any more than that which it currently plays. Indeed many regulations would become unnecessary as social, cultural and environmental welfare would be intrinsically factored into ordinary business decisions.
Of course all of this fits conceptually very nicely into the work Feasta has been doing for a Cap and (equal per capita) Share of green house gas emission rights. See www.capandshare.org for an update. What I think the idea really needs is another book entitled 'Socialism 3.0' that says more or less the same thing but from a European perspective. Together they could bookend a conceptual framework for an Earth and human friendly new economic system.
7 of 7 people found the following review to be helpful:
Must Read Economics...A New Theory of the Commons, October 29, 2006
By BaileNaBraith
I recommend this book for breaking out of tired approaches to economics.
Barnes argues we need a new "operating system" to deal with problems inherent in the current form of capitalism -- problems such as growing inequality and pollution. He describes an economic theory of the "commons" which defies some of the traditional right-left dictotomies. Well written and a breath of fresh air.
9 of 10 people found the following review to be helpful:
Clean, Clear Guide to the Commons, November 20, 2006
By Adam M. Werbach
Peter Barnes has long been one of the leading "working-theorists" promoting the commons. Capitalism 3.0 takes the theories advanced by people like David Bollier, Larry Lessig, Vandan Shiva, David Morris and distills them into an easy-to-read narrative format that build on Barnes' last work, "Who Owns the Sky?"
The book is refreshingly easy to read for the genre, and is required reading for anyone who is serious about finding a new framework to organize around. It's way past time for us to rearrange our politics and regulation around a concept as robust as the commons.
0 items in cart
