Amazon Reviews
17 of 17 people found the following review to be helpful:
This book makes a lot of sense., January 27, 2009
By Grace
This is a pretty good book. The main point of this book is that mainstream economics is based on the idea of infinite growth, and that this is simply impossible on a finite planet. Okay, that's pretty basic environmentalist wisdom so far. Where the authors then differentiate themselves is that they've actually got some pretty concrete ideas of how to go about correcting this problem. This is definitely not one of those environmental books that dumps a whole lot of grisly facts on you and then advises changing to CFL bulbs and riding your bike more as the whole solution. (I own a surprising number of these.) The changes these guys suggest would require more than individual efforts, they'll need concentrated work at the national and even international levels. This is where the authors draw from their own heritage for inspiration; they're both Quakers, which is a group that always seems to get a lot more done than you'd expect. This book doesn't minimize the size of the environmental problem, but they're pretty optimistic about people's ability to make the mental shift necessary to deal with it from a basis of clarity and respect for the world. The result is a book that makes you want to do stuff, and makes you think you actually can.
11 of 11 people found the following review to be helpful:
Clear and Concise Blueprint for Global Change, February 4, 2009
By A. Mayer
If you are reading this review I am assuming you are looking for books about ecological economics and alternatives to our current global system of rapid resource depletion and barbequeing the planet, so I will spare you an introduction into this subject.
Right relationship borrows from various religious/spiritual traditions and fits them within a modern ecological economics framework. Change must include more than just a scattered radicals and if religious institutions can be engaged in reforms also than true progress is much more likely.
The book paints a picture of economic as well as ecological interdepedance, a vision of mutually shared destiny which is seems somewhat compatible with pre-neoclassical concept of market economics (ie modern "conservative" economics idealogy focusses on this false notion of individualism which is inherently impossible in a deeply connected economic world such as our own) . In other words, it avoids fiery polemics about revolution in exchange for pragmatic arguments about a different set of global priorities and principles. The tone of the book is exactly the way these issues need to be discussed to continue to transition the movement for ecologically friendly economics to the center of the political spectrum.
One of the more profound ideas advanced is that we already have a de facto world gov't-transnational corporations. Many nations have a nationalistic cultural impulse that tends to view any type of global governance as a threat to culture, sovereignty, etc.
Right Relationship makes a clear case that such ideas are dated and that, like it our not, we have a deeply integrated world economy dominated by transnational corporations that requires various types of global governance to curtail our eventual ecological calamity and the suffering it will exact on all forms of life.
To conclude, this is an excellent book for its ideas and the brevity at which said ideas are expressed. Highly recommended for anyone interested in ecological challenges, economics, geo-politics or public policy.
11 of 12 people found the following review to be helpful:
Right time for "Right Relationship", May 25, 2009
By Jack Santa-barbara
RIGHT RELATIONSHIP: BUILDING A WHOLE EARTH ECONOMY by Peter G Brown and Geoffrey Garver, with Keith Helmuth, Robert Howell and Steve Szeghi; Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, 2009
"Right Relationship" is a book for the worrying-about-collapse weary. It is a book for those of us who realize the world we live in is in great peril and that something fundamental has to change to ensure the human story continues and flourishes.
While there are many features of the book that make it hopeful, two in particular stand out. The book lays out a broad framework for change, including a moral base, that encompasses all arenas from the local to the global, and it arises from a Quaker tradition which has had remarkable successes in the past - the abolition of slavery being only one noteworthy example.
The neoclassical economic paradigm that has been so successful at providing material goods is clearly identified as the main culprit in both the destruction of ecological systems and the creation of enormous inequities that characterize the current condition of our special planet. As the authors point out, the economy is about relationships, as is ecology. And the current relationship we humans have with both is wrong. They are wrong because our economic activities are destroying the life support systems for the commonwealth of life that sustain us, and these same activities reward those who least need more and disadvantage those whose needs are greatest.
Their analysis of the problem we face is not new, but it is one receiving increasing support from an ever wider range of writers and thinkers - from James Lovelock to Lester Brown to Tom Freidman. What is somewhat different about the analysis in Right Relationship is the moral basis for both the analyses, and thus the solutions. And what may be even more refreshing for some is that the moral basis is not derived from a "sacred text" but from the fundamental truths of science. The authors point out that many of these truths are also included in sacred texts, so there is not a conflict but rather an integration of traditional spiritual values with the more recent perspective of current scientific inquiry.
The authors point out that even within the hard sciences of physics and chemistry, the earlier reductionist approach has given way to a holistic systems approach - one of contexts or relationships - the increasing recognition that everything is connected in complex and profound ways. This recognition, however, has not yet been integrated with how we make use of the earth's finite resources to provide for our well being - how we run our economy. Hence the wrong relationships of our economic activities give rise to ecological catastrophe and social inequity.
"Right relationships" are those which "tend to preserve the integrity, resilience, and beauty of the commonwealth of life." They are wrong when they tend otherwise. The term "commonwealth of life" is also defined in terms of embracing all living things (i.e. not being human centric), emphasizes the interdependence of all living things, and as something that is concerned with the common good. Hence, the "global economy" is one which "works for all of life's commonwealth."
The focus on the economy as the arena for radical change leads to a series of basic questions: what is the economy for? How does it work? How big is too big? What is fair? And How should it be governed?
The authors' answers to these questions do not come up with anything that has not been previously stated by others. Nor are the steps outlined to achieve a whole earth economy activities that have not been previously identified. What is encouraging about this outline is that it is not just a series of steps identified and then left to others to implement. The book itself is part of a larger Quaker initiated project called the Moral Economy Project (www.moraleconomy.org). Its aim is to take the steps and implement them.
There is no sugar coating of the difficulties involved in creating a new economic paradigm based on right relationships. But the book does identify a wide range of activities and institutions already in place which are actively working for one or another aspect of this grand plan.
One of the proposed institutions is a Global Federation, the purposes of which "are global security and the protection of human rights and life's commonwealth." For those concerned about a potentially Orwellian global government, the authors point out the status quo "is to allow actual control of the planet to remain in the hands of the current de facto Big Brother of unelected, unaccountable commercial leaders and entities that recognize no responsibility for the public good."
In addition to proposing four global institutions needed for a whole earth economy, the authors provide a summary of how close, or far, we are from making such institutions a reality. They ask whether the concepts behind these proposed institutions are ready for implementation. They conclude that models already exist for three of the four proposed institutions, although modification is needed for adaptation to a global level. Federalism, for example, is a well known and established political mechanism that can be adapted to the common good; but no attempts have yet been made to establish it at a global level.
The institution that is least ready is what they term the Global Reserve. "The principal purpose of the Global Reserve is the analysis of the earth's life support budgets and their uses in accordance with right relationship with the commonwealth of life." The goal of the Global Reserve is to prevent "the total human economic impact from overrunning the integrity, resilience and beauty of life's commonwealth." It is suggested that the IPAT formula be used in this task and that it be expanded to an IPATE formula, where the E stands for ethics. This framework would then be used to identify policy and ethical choices to ensure what impact is sustainable. Use of the IPATE formula ensures that we do not rely exclusively on the T component (technology), which appears to be the default position for world leaders who are intent on continuing economic growth. A whole earth economy requires that we also deal with population and consumption and ethics.
This brief overview of the book may make it sound simplistic and idealistic. While the book is written in a straightforward and accessible style, there are many practical perspectives and informed suggestions to shore up this idealistic framework. And the approach rightly, I believe, clearly identifies the values and ideals that need to change for a whole earth economy to work. And as the authors point out, "what is truly unrealistic is the idea that continuing down the current economic path will ever serve the common good, or save the life forms and cultural traditions of this planet from their march toward extinction."
The Quaker tradition of taking on the necessary but seemingly undoable is an inspiration. This is a project we can all contribute to, even if we believe many unpleasant consequences of the current paradigm are inevitable. A whole earth economy is possible, the authors point out in the last words of the book, " ...if we have time."
1 of 1 people found the following review to be helpful:
The economy should not be controlling the earth, October 27, 2009
By Readers Favorite
When I began reading this book my first thought was Genesis 1:26b "Let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth."
The definition of dominion according to Webster is "Sovereign or supreme authority; the power of governing and controlling; independent right of possession, use, and control; sovereignty; supremacy."
When one has dominion over something he rules and controls it. However, it goes a bit farther than most will admit. To rule or control something is to take care of it, to keep it safe, to meet its needs.
Peter G. Brown and Geoffrey Garver look at the problem of Global Warming and the root cause which is our economy. The economy should not be controlling the earth. They use the phrase "Tread lightly on the Earth." They also ask 5 questions and discuss the answer.
What's the economy for?
"The economy is part of the earth system and it has to be respectful of and obey the rules." The concept of the authors reminds me of a cooperative. People work together to the benefit of all. They do not under cut each other's price. The goal is not to get extremely wealthy but to "provide rich and fulfilling lives for both individuals and communities." Currently the economy is "survival of the fittest."
We have forgotten the difference between desire and needs.
How does it work?
Much of this is common sense. Stewardship of the land was clearly laid out in scripture. The authors discuss farming: cutting hay at the appropriate time, and fighting erosion. I see this as education or reeducation. As in farming one must understand how something works. Too often we work our land until it is dead. "Thinking about how the economy works only in conventional terms like supply and demand, market dynamics, financial incentives, and the like miss the big picture." A good farmer knows the importance of allowing the ground to rest, the importance of a cover crop, and the importance of taking care of the land. We are killing the golden goose rather than caring for the goose.
How big is too big?
The authors stress limits, they use a comparison to a home thermostat. We set the temperature to a tolerable level. We must set the economic thermostat to a tolerable level, this means setting limits. We know there is a limited amount of resources. Yet we attempt to use it all up as though it will magically reproduce.
The authors discuss an ecosystem and how it interacts with other ecosystems.
What's fair?
"Our current economic system is geared to promoting as much short-term wealth and consumption as possible and to making sure that investments increase as rapidly as possible, while minimizing regulation." There has to be a way to dispense the economy's benefits and yoke. We must look at the human rights issue and we think our responsibility.
How should it be governed?
This is the chapter that makes me uncomfortable. The authors have excellent ideals. Unfortunately, not everyone has the integrity of Brown and Garver. Even the authors admit this fact. They set 5 core principles:
Capacity and Authority
Credibility
Accountability and Effectiveness
Transparency
Subsidiary
They also suggest 4 global institutions for a whole Earth economy.
Brown and Garver base much of their book on their faith. I admire them and their beliefs. Their suggestions are worthy and workable if man was not corrupt. I am a bit concerned with the idea of a Global Economy. I am not for a One World Order and their suggestions do lead that direction.
Having said that, in a perfect world, where man had integrity, this would work. However, in a world where leaders are corrupt and taking food away from their people in exchange for weapons, it won't work. I do what I can in my own small space. Perhaps that is where we must start. If we reach out to those around us first, show them love, meet their needs and then exponentially that will grow.
Right Relationship is an excellent read. It gives the reader much to ponder. The ideals behind this book will stay with you long after you lay the book down. This book is easy to read and understand. Unlike many other books on this topic, you do not have to be a economics major to understand the authors' points. I highly recommend this book. We need to seriously look at this problem and Brown and Garver may have the answer.
0 of 0 people found the following review to be helpful:
Morally intelligent, hopeful, January 30, 2010
By Faith
Thorough treatment of a crisis that remains shockingly ignored.
The content is accessible to the general reader.
Extremely important reading for all.
0 items in cart
